If you’re relying on Arduino for teaching, prototyping, robotics, or production workflows, you’re now in a transition period you didn’t choose. With the Qualcomm acquisition and early signals of tightening licensing, documentation access, and ecosystem control, it’s time to treat Arduino as a platform that may not remain fully open in the future.
This doesn’t mean panic. It means planning.
Below is a clear outline of why a migration strategy matters, who is stepping into the vacuum, and what hardware ecosystems you can safely shift toward.
A Quick Summary of EEVblog #1721 — “RIP Arduino (New T&C Deep Dive)”
Reference Links: Old vs New Arduino Terms & Conditions
- Archived (Sept 12, 2025 snapshot): https://web.archive.org/web/20250912221625/https://www.arduino.cc/en/terms-conditions/
- Current Version: https://www.arduino.cc/en/terms-conditions/
The comparison between these two versions highlights how dramatically the Terms & Conditions expanded after the Qualcomm acquisition.
Summary from EEVblog #1721 — “RIP Arduino (New T&C Deep Dive)” #1721 — “RIP Arduino (New T&C Deep Dive)”
Dave Jones from EEVblog reviewed the new Arduino Terms & Conditions after the Qualcomm acquisition. His findings reinforce why migration planning matters:
- The acquisition fits a familiar pattern: big corporate buyout → KPI pressure → platform pivots toward monetization → potential subscription models.
- He estimates the acquisition value at ~$250M, meaning Qualcomm will push hard for revenue recovery.
- Arduino’s goodwill collapses when hobbyists realize they’re supporting a giant corporation instead of a community-driven project.
- New Terms & Conditions (updated weeks after the acquisition) introduce major red flags:
- Irrevocable content license — anything you upload, they now own permanently.
- Junior (under‑18) accounts restricted — a huge portion of Arduino’s beginner audience.
- Clauses limiting competitive or derivative services — contradicting open-source culture.
- Export & trade restrictions — newly expanded legal sections.
- Broad rights to revoke your access to their platform or services.
- Massive increase in legal complexity — from ~14 sections to 21+, packed with arbitration and indemnification clauses.
- The overall direction signals that Arduino is “circling the drain,” in Dave’s words.
- Because the hardware is open‑licensed, community forks are possible, but everything connected to Arduino’s platform (cloud, IDE integrations, packaged services) can be revoked.
These changes don’t break existing boards immediately — but they erode trust and signal that openness is no longer the priority. This is why preparing a migration path now is the safer long‑term strategy.
Arduino has always succeeded because it was open: open hardware, open documentation, open firmware, and a global community that learned and innovated together. When that openness becomes uncertain, the risks show up in very practical ways:
- You may lose access to updated open design files.
- Future boards may ship with locked-down components.
- Licensing changes may affect derivative designs.
- Classroom and training materials may become outdated.
- Production workflows depending on open hardware could break.
Once a platform starts tightening control, the ecosystem tends to fragment. It’s better to shift gradually now while your options are still wide.
The Good News: Alternatives Are Mature and Healthy
The gap that Arduino leaves behind is not empty. Three ecosystems are already established, stable, and openly documented.
1. Espressif (ESP32 family)
- Fully open documentation.
- Massive community support.
- Ultra-low cost.
- Integrated WiFi/BLE.
- Already the backbone of most IoT devices.
2. Raspberry Pi Pico / RP2040
- Transparent documentation and strong community.
- Affordable and reliable.
- Large ecosystem of breakout boards and accessories.
3. Open-Hardware-Centric Manufacturers
- Adafruit and SparkFun publish schematics and support open designs.
- Seeed, Lolin, DFRobot, Waveshare offer low-cost, well-supported boards.
- Pine64 and Libre-Computer fill the high-openness niche.
These providers aren’t experimental — they’re already powering millions of projects.
A Simple Migration Approach You Can Start Today
You don’t have to overhaul everything at once. Here’s a lightweight transition plan so you can shift without disruption.
Step 1: Freeze Your Current Arduino Dependencies
Download and archive:
- Schematics
- PCB layout files (if available)
- Bootloader versions
- Core libraries
- Toolchains
This guarantees you can still build what you’re using now.
Step 2: Begin New Prototypes on ESP32 or RP2040
These MCUs are affordable and widely supported. Most Arduino libraries already work with minimal changes.
Step 3: Update Your Teaching Materials
If you run classes or workshops, gradually shift your lesson plans to:
- ESP32 basics
- MicroPython on RP2040
- CircuitPython for rapid hardware experiments
Step 4: Evaluate If You Need Your Own Fork
Since older Arduino designs were open-licensed (CC BY-SA), you can:
- Fork the open boards
- Rename them
- Manufacture locally or with partners
- Maintain long-term stability independent of supplier decisions
This is especially useful for schools, labs, and organizations that need predictable hardware sources.
Step 5: Choose an Ecosystem Standard for the Future
Pick one or two platforms and align your documentation, training, and inventory around them.
If Your Work Depends on Open Hardware, Don’t Wait
It’s easier to migrate when you’re not forced to. Arduino’s shift in direction doesn’t erase the value it provided, but it’s a signal: the open hardware community must maintain control of its tools.
By starting your transition now, you build resilience into your projects, classes, and products. You ensure that the future of your hardware isn’t controlled by a single corporation but remains in the hands of builders, educators, and engineers.
If you want, I can help turn this into:
- A shorter Facebook-ready post
- A technical migration guide
- A workshop outline for your students or staff